LensReading which lens this session carries.
MK9B-1032Evidence postedlow materiality

Advocacy asset at log outcome

Amara Muller

Marketing · Customer Advocacy · MK9B Reference Request

$3k

value

80%

confidence

7

people affected

21m

age

57m

sla

100%

progress

Currently held by

Usage Rights Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Priya Kaplan

Requester of record

At station

Log outcome

Workflow layer · station 5 of 5

Where this train is on the line

MK9BReference RequestTransactional · 5 stations

Match request

2 q

Check fatigue

18 q

Secure consent

1 q

Broker call

14 q

Log outcome

1 live

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared match request

    -21m

    Advocate Identification Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared check fatigue

    -17m

    Advocate Identification Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  3. Cleared secure consent

    -13m

    Director, Customer Advocacy

    Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited

  4. Cleared broker call

    -8m

    Review Solicitation Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  5. Holding at log outcome

    -4m

    Advocate Health Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

This is the last station.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 21m against a commitment of 57m · 37% of the time used
materiality low · blast radius 7 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading