LensReading which lens this session carries.
MK9B-1000In flightmedium materiality

Advocacy asset at check fatigue

Zara Lindqvist

Marketing · Customer Advocacy · MK9B Reference Request

$46k

value

94%

confidence

7

people affected

1h 4m

age

3h 12m

sla

40%

progress

Currently held by

GBS spine

Running in the shared AI GBS spine

Raised by

Simon Petrov

Requester of record

At station

Check fatigue

AI GBS layer · station 2 of 5

Where this train is on the line

MK9BReference RequestTransactional · 5 stations

Match request

2 q

Check fatigue

1 live

Secure consent

1 q

Broker call

14 q

Log outcome

12 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared match request

    -64m

    Advocate Identification Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Holding at check fatigue

    -32m

    Advocate Identification Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Secure consent

run by Director, Customer Advocacy · Policy layer

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the advocacy asset decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

approver Director, Customer Advocacy

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 1h 4m against a commitment of 3h 12m · 33% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 7 records or people downstream
state in-flight — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading