LensReading which lens this session carries.
MK9A-1040In flightmedium materiality

Advocacy asset at identify candidate

Ethan Whitfield

Marketing · Customer Advocacy · MK9A Case Study Production

$85k

value

96%

confidence

30

people affected

1h 5m

age

4h 16m

sla

14%

progress

Currently held by

Advocate Health Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Ines Brennan

Requester of record

At station

Identify candidate

Workflow layer · station 1 of 7

Where this train is on the line

MK9ACase Study ProductionTransactional · 7 stations

Identify candidate

1 live

Secure consent

2 q

Interview

14 q

Draft

20 q

Customer approve

5 q

Legal clear

9 q

Publish

10 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Holding at identify candidate

    -65m

    Advocate Identification Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Secure consent

run by Director, Customer Advocacy · Policy layer

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the advocacy asset decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

approver Director, Customer Advocacy

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 1h 5m against a commitment of 4h 16m · 25% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 30 records or people downstream
state in-flight — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading