Advocacy asset at draft
Mei Farouk
Marketing · Customer Advocacy · MK9A Case Study Production
$14k
value
88%
confidence
27
people affected
23m
age
19m
sla
57%
progress
Currently held by
Advocate Identification Agent
An agent owns the next move
Raised by
Sofia Tanaka
Requester of record
At station
Draft
Workflow layer · station 4 of 7
Where this train is on the line
Evidence trail
Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind
This is the readable trail. more
Cleared identify candidate
-23mAdvocate Identification Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Cleared secure consent
-17mDirector, Customer Advocacy
Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited
Cleared interview
-12mCase Study Drafting Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Holding at draft
-6mReview Solicitation Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
What happens next
The next station and its rule
Customer approve
run by Director, Customer Advocacy · Policy layer
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the advocacy asset decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
approver Director, Customer Advocacy
Why the signal is what it is
Derived from time against commitment, not from the state
Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.
Past SLA by 4m · 27 people or records downstream of this decision