LensReading which lens this session carries.
HR2B-1041Evidence postedlow materiality

Requisition at re-surface

Bruno Sandoval

Human Resources · Talent Acquisition · HR2B Talent Pool Nurture

$4k

value

69%

confidence

34

people affected

1h 23m

age

4h 10m

sla

100%

progress

Currently held by

Intake & Req Definition Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Daniel Novak

Requester of record

At station

Re-surface

Workflow layer · station 5 of 5

Where this train is on the line

HR2BTalent Pool NurtureTransactional · 5 stations

Identify

29 q

Segment

35 q

Engage

30 q

Qualify

27 q

Re-surface

1 live

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared identify

    -83m

    Intake & Req Definition Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared segment

    -66m

    Sourcing Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  3. Cleared engage

    -50m

    Screening Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  4. Cleared qualify

    -33m

    Scheduling Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  5. Holding at re-surface

    -17m

    Assessment Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

This is the last station.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 1h 23m against a commitment of 4h 10m · 33% of the time used
materiality low · blast radius 34 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading