LensReading which lens this session carries.
HR2B-1034Evidence postedmedium materiality

Requisition at engage

Jonas Delgado

Human Resources · Talent Acquisition · HR2B Talent Pool Nurture

$43k

value

83%

confidence

9

people affected

2h 28m

age

2h 6m

sla

60%

progress

Currently held by

Offer Modeling Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Idris Farouk

Requester of record

At station

Engage

Workflow layer · station 3 of 5

Where this train is on the line

HR2BTalent Pool NurtureTransactional · 5 stations

Identify

29 q

Segment

35 q

Engage

1 live

Qualify

27 q

Re-surface

43 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared identify

    -148m

    Intake & Req Definition Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared segment

    -99m

    Sourcing Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  3. Holding at engage

    -49m

    Screening Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Qualify

run by Scheduling Agent · Workflow layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 2h 28m against a commitment of 2h 6m · 117% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 9 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 22m · 9 people or records downstream of this decision