LensReading which lens this session carries.
HR2B-1004Auto-clearedlow materiality

Requisition at re-surface

Farrah Kaplan

Human Resources · Talent Acquisition · HR2B Talent Pool Nurture

$37k

value

85%

confidence

39

people affected

2h 4m

age

4h 10m

sla

100%

progress

Currently held by

Assessment Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Aaron Haddad

Requester of record

At station

Re-surface

Workflow layer · station 5 of 5

Where this train is on the line

HR2BTalent Pool NurtureTransactional · 5 stations

Identify

29 q

Segment

35 q

Engage

30 q

Qualify

27 q

Re-surface

1 live

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared identify

    -124m

    Intake & Req Definition Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared segment

    -99m

    Sourcing Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  3. Cleared engage

    -74m

    Screening Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  4. Cleared qualify

    -50m

    Scheduling Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  5. Holding at re-surface

    -25m

    Assessment Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

This is the last station.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 2h 4m against a commitment of 4h 10m · 50% of the time used
materiality low · blast radius 39 records or people downstream
state auto-cleared — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading