LensReading which lens this session carries.
CS6B-1043In flightlow materiality

Field job at re-sequence

Farrah Nakamura

Customer Service · Field Service Dispatch · CS6B Same-day Re-optimization

$18k

value

87%

confidence

21

people affected

2h 46m

age

1h 23m

sla

40%

progress

Currently held by

Dispatch Orchestrator

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Elena Mensah

Requester of record

At station

Re-sequence

Workflow layer · station 2 of 5

Where this train is on the line

CS6BSame-day Re-optimizationTransactional · 5 stations

Detect disruption

39 q

Re-sequence

1 live

Notify customer

19 q

Confirm

20 q

Execute

29 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared detect disruption

    -166m

    Job Qualification Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Holding at re-sequence

    -83m

    Skills Matching Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Notify customer

run by Job Qualification Agent · AI GBS layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Handed to the AI GBS depot

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 2h 46m against a commitment of 1h 23m · 200% of the time used
materiality low · blast radius 21 records or people downstream
state in-flight — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 1h 23m · 21 people or records downstream of this decision