LensReading which lens this session carries.
CS10A-1011Evidence postedhigh materiality

Roster at draft roster

Amara Delgado

Customer Service · Workforce Management · CS10A Forecast to Schedule

$2.2m

value

77%

confidence

7

people affected

5h 23m

age

15h 36m

sla

50%

progress

Currently held by

Volume Forecast Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Owen Tanaka

Requester of record

At station

Draft roster

Workflow layer · station 3 of 6

Where this train is on the line

CS10AForecast to ScheduleAnalytical · 6 stations

Forecast volume

6 q

Model capacity

3 q

Draft roster

1 live

Compliance check

43 q

Publish

3 q

Distribute

11 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared forecast volume

    -323m

    Volume Forecast Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared model capacity

    -215m

    Capacity Model Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  3. Holding at draft roster

    -108m

    Shift Scheduling Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Compliance check

run by Shift Scheduling Agent · AI GBS layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Handed to the AI GBS depot

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 5h 23m against a commitment of 15h 36m · 35% of the time used
materiality high · blast radius 7 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading