LensReading which lens this session carries.
The catalogueHuman ResourcesExit ManagementJudgment

Service HR9C

Reduction in Force

Runs judgment. Starts when a leadership team frames the question. It runs 1 times a week across 8 stations. 3 of those stations stop for a person and 5 are done by an agent, 1 of them on the shared spine.

Runs a week

1

70 in flight right now.

Stations

8

3 person · 4 agent · 1 spine

Agent share of steps

63%

Autonomy on this service is set at 59% against a ceiling of 60%.

Decisions a person makes

3

Held by Director, Employee Relations.

Touchless

12%

Share of runs that complete without anybody opening them.

Timetable against actual

710.4h

Actual 628.7h, 81.7h under the timetable.

Operations

The lane diagram

Read it left to right.

Person3 stations and 58% of the dwellAgent4 stations and 33% of the dwellShared spine1 station and 10% of the dwell3 crossings between lanes
Human
decides
Agent
does the work
GBS
shared spine
System
attributed by rule
Core HR and Payroll
Core HR and Payroll
Core HR and Payroll
Core HR and Payroll
Core HR and Payroll
Core HR and Payroll
Core HR and Payroll
Core HR and Payroll
Click any station to see who does it, what it costs in time, the rule that gates it and the system attributed to it.

Operations

Every station in order

The same stations as a list, with the dwell the estate records against each one and the system a station of that shape would touch.

#StationLaneWhoLayerDwellTargetIn flightSystem
1

Frame scope

AgentResignation Intake Agentstrategy22h 31m45h 23m28Core HR and Payroll
2

Model selection

AgentExit Interview Agentstrategy55h 27m72h 21m4Core HR and Payroll
3

Adverse impact test

AgentKnowledge Capture Agentstrategy23h 43m45h 55m10Core HR and Payroll
4

Legal review

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the exit case decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

Hands over at legal

HumanDirector, Employee Relationspolicy47h 2m67h 47m1Core HR and Payroll
5

Works council

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the exit case decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

HumanDirector, Employee Relationspolicy132h 22m152h 56m0Core HR and Payroll
6

Leadership ratify

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the exit case decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

HumanDirector, Employee Relationspolicy77h 23m135h 45m4Core HR and Payroll
7

Sequence

AgentAttrition Signal Agentstrategy44h 3m71h 15m8Core HR and Payroll
8

Execute

GBSResignation Intake Agentgbs42h 46m83h 24m15Core HR and Payroll

Operations

Run it

Change the volume, move the autonomy line, release a gate, and watch what happens to the hours in each lane and to the time it takes one run to get through.

Move something
Demand100%
1 a week is what the estate records.
Decisions handed to agents0 of 3
Cheapest decision first. The last gate never moves: something on this service always ends with a person.
People on the gates8 people
Each one is assumed to have 2,100 productive minutes a week, which is 35 hours.
Agent speed100%
100% is the dwell the estate records today.
Person time a week
256.8h
1 items at 15,407 minutes of decision each.
Agent time a week
188.5h
11,310 minutes an item, which does not compete for a person.
Gate load
92%
Inside capacity, with 23.2h of headroom.
Stations without a person
63%
3 gates left on 8 stations.
Where an item spends its time
58% waiting on a person
42% in the agent lane
An item now takes 26,717 minutes of worked time end to end against 26,717 in the recorded estate, a change of +0%. This is worked time, not calendar time: nothing here models a queue or a weekend.
What this model is, on Reduction in Force

The simulation is arithmetic on the estate, not a queueing model.

How it runs

Run it again, going wrong

The same unit and the same stations, broken the way the estate already records breaking.

8 stations, walked twice

Once clean, once with the categories the estate counts

This is the same unit on the same stations, breaking.

No break below was chosen.

One play head, two tracks, the same scale. The clean run stops when it runs out of stations; the other one keeps going.

As written

8 stations, nothing waiting, nothing sent back

0 min of 18.6 days

now Frame scope · Resignation Intake Agent · 23 hrs

As the ledger has it

the same stations, plus 5 categories the estate already counts

0 min of 19.4 days

now Frame scope · Resignation Intake Agent · 23 hrs

personagentshared spinework the break addsnobody working it

What breaks, and where it is counted

No break below was chosen.

What the two runs say together

5 counted categories land on this procedure.

What this run cannot claim

These breaks are shown together on one unit so the shape of a bad day fits on one screen.

Attestations on this estate are written against intake items, not against procedures, so a step done off the platform cannot be matched to the attestation that covers it.

Two clocks run. Worked time is the sum of the time the work is actually being done …

Live observability

Systems this service would touch

Attributed by rule from the function's system list.

1 systems attributed

0 of 1 returning records

Core HR and Payroll

Workday HCM · hcm · bidirectional · critical

modeled

8 of 8 stations attributed here · would write back

System attribution is a rule, not a reading.

Who runs it

Orchestration and accountability

Orchestrated by
Exit Orchestrator
That orchestrator’s remit
Owns exit case work end to end inside Human Resources. Runs 3 lines across 24 stations, drains the repeatable share into the H2R tower, and holds 6 human gates.
Accountable person
Director, Employee Relations
Sub-function
Exit Management
Shared spine tower
h2r
Hand-over points
legal

Other services in this sub-function

2 alongside this one

What this page is and is not

This is a catalogue of the modeled estate.