LensReading which lens this session carries.
SL9B-1015Evidence postedlow materiality

Renewal at approve concession

Owen Voss

Sales · Expansion & Renewals · SL9B At-risk Save

$37k

value

80%

confidence

13

people affected

13h 0m

age

19h 50m

sla

67%

progress

Currently held by

Save Play Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Beatriz Voss

Requester of record

At station

Approve concession

Policy layer · station 4 of 6

Where this train is on the line

SL9BAt-risk SaveTransactional · 6 stations

Detect churn signal

31 q

Diagnose

28 q

Select save play

11 q

Approve concession

1 live

Execute

29 q

Track

0 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared detect churn signal

    -780m

    Renewal Risk Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared diagnose

    -585m

    Usage Signal Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  3. Cleared select save play

    -390m

    Uplift Modeling Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  4. Holding at approve concession

    -195m

    VP Customer Growth

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Execute

run by Save Play Agent · Workflow layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 13h 0m against a commitment of 19h 50m · 66% of the time used
materiality low · blast radius 13 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading