LensReading which lens this session carries.
SL9A-1010In flightmedium materiality

Renewal at score risk

Bruno Ellery

Sales · Expansion & Renewals · SL9A Renewal Cycle

$61k

value

94%

confidence

34

people affected

3h 37m

age

2h 3m

sla

29%

progress

Currently held by

Expansion Signal Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Rosa Ito

Requester of record

At station

Score risk

Workflow layer · station 2 of 7

Where this train is on the line

SL9ARenewal CycleTransactional · 7 stations

Trigger at 120 days

2 q

Score risk

1 live

Model uplift

43 q

Draft quote

29 q

Rep review

8 q

Negotiate

6 q

Book

14 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared trigger at 120 days

    -217m

    Renewal Risk Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  2. Holding at score risk

    -109m

    Usage Signal Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Model uplift

run by Uplift Modeling Agent · Workflow layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 3h 37m against a commitment of 2h 3m · 176% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 34 records or people downstream
state in-flight — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 1h 34m · 34 people or records downstream of this decision