LensReading which lens this session carries.
SL5B-1029In flightmedium materiality

Proposal at capture need

Talia Mensah

Sales · Solution & Proposal · SL5B Standard Proposal

$88k

value

85%

confidence

36

people affected

3h 6m

age

2h 17m

sla

17%

progress

Currently held by

Requirements Extraction Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Aaron Raman

Requester of record

At station

Capture need

Workflow layer · station 1 of 6

Where this train is on the line

SL5BStandard ProposalTransactional · 6 stations

Capture need

1 live

Configure

17 q

Price

12 q

Draft

6 q

Seller review

2 q

Send

35 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Holding at capture need

    -186m

    Requirements Extraction Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Configure

run by Requirements Extraction Agent · AI GBS layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Handed to the AI GBS depot

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 3h 6m against a commitment of 2h 17m · 136% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 36 records or people downstream
state in-flight — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 49m · 36 people or records downstream of this decision