LensReading which lens this session carries.
SL5A-1007In flightmedium materiality

Proposal at compliance matrix

Naomi Petrov

Sales · Solution & Proposal · SL5A RFP Response

$63k

value

93%

confidence

36

people affected

1h 44m

age

1h 28m

sla

33%

progress

Currently held by

Requirements Extraction Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Ines Delgado

Requester of record

At station

Compliance matrix

Workflow layer · station 3 of 9

Where this train is on the line

SL5ARFP ResponseTransactional · 9 stations

Intake RFP

45 q

Extract requirements

42 q

Compliance matrix

1 live

Configure solution

7 q

Assemble pricing

43 q

Draft response

9 q

Legal check

7 q

Bid decision

3 q

Submit

36 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared intake rfp

    -104m

    Requirements Extraction Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared extract requirements

    -69m

    Solution Configuration Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  3. Holding at compliance matrix

    -35m

    Reference Selection Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Configure solution

run by Proposal Drafting Agent · Workflow layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 1h 44m against a commitment of 1h 28m · 118% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 36 records or people downstream
state in-flight — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 16m · 36 people or records downstream of this decision