LensReading which lens this session carries.
SC9B-1013Evidence postedmedium materiality

Promise at notify

Lukas Marchetti

Supply Chain · Order Promising · SC9B Promise Breach Response

$77k

value

70%

confidence

31

people affected

1h 12m

age

2h 15m

sla

100%

progress

Currently held by

M2D spine

Running in the shared AI GBS spine

Raised by

Farrah Novak

Requester of record

At station

Notify

AI GBS layer · station 5 of 5

Where this train is on the line

SC9BPromise Breach ResponseTransactional · 5 stations

Detect slip

0 q

Assess customer impact

35 q

Draft communication

0 q

Owner approve

3 q

Notify

1 live

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared detect slip

    -72m

    Available-to-Promise Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  2. Cleared assess customer impact

    -58m

    Capable-to-Promise Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  3. Cleared draft communication

    -43m

    Substitution Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  4. Cleared owner approve

    -29m

    Director, Order Promising

    Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited

  5. Holding at notify

    -14m

    Available-to-Promise Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

What happens next

The next station and its rule

This is the last station.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 1h 12m against a commitment of 2h 15m · 53% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 31 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading