Order at re-submit

Hiro Delgado

Revenue Growth Management · Booking & Order Management · RO4B Order Exception

$57k

value

91%

confidence

people affected

4h 9m

age

3h 20m

sla

100%

progress

Currently held by

O2C spine

Running in the shared AI GBS spine

Raised by

Naomi Voss

Requester of record

At station

Re-submit

AI GBS layer · station 5 of 5

Where this train is on the line

RO4BOrder ExceptionTransactional · 5 stations

Detect exception

19 q

Classify

2 q

Auto-resolve

43 q

Human resolve

8 q

Re-submit

1 live

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

Auditor pack

This is the readable trail. more

Cleared detect exception
-249m
Order Validation Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Cleared classify
-199m
Credit Check Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Cleared auto-resolve
-149m
Order Validation Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Cleared human resolve
-100m
Director, Order Management
Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited
Holding at re-submit
-50m
Order Validation Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

What happens next

The next station and its rule

This is the last station. more

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 4h 9m against a commitment of 3h 20m · 125% of the time used

materiality medium · blast radius 24 records or people downstream

state auto-cleared — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 49m · 24 people or records downstream of this decision