LensReading which lens this session carries.
RO1A-1032Evidence postedmedium materiality

Record at close

Oscar Lindqvist

Revenue Growth Management · CRM Data Stewardship · RO1A Continuous Hygiene

$81k

value

67%

confidence

23

people affected

3h 39m

age

3h 30m

sla

100%

progress

Currently held by

Duplicate Detection Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Grace Ferreira

Requester of record

At station

Close

Workflow layer · station 6 of 6

Where this train is on the line

RO1AContinuous HygieneTransactional · 6 stations

Scan

28 q

Detect defect

36 q

Auto-merge

42 q

Auto-enrich

41 q

Steward review

5 q

Close

1 live

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared detect defect

    -219m

    Enrichment Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared auto-merge

    -175m

    Field Completeness Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  3. Cleared auto-enrich

    -131m

    Field Completeness Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  4. Cleared steward review

    -88m

    Director, Revenue Data

    Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited

  5. Holding at close

    -44m

    Data Policy Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

This is the last station.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 3h 39m against a commitment of 3h 30m · 104% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 23 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 9m · 23 people or records downstream of this decision