LensReading which lens this session carries.
PR9B-1022Evidence postedmedium materiality

Invoice at score duplicate risk

Mei Sorensen

Procurement & Source-to-Pay · Invoice & Three-Way Match · PR9B Duplicate & Fraud Sweep

$88k

value

67%

confidence

22

people affected

1h 47m

age

1h 26m

sla

40%

progress

Currently held by

S2P spine

Running in the shared AI GBS spine

Raised by

Pierre Petrov

Requester of record

At station

Score duplicate risk

AI GBS layer · station 2 of 5

Where this train is on the line

PR9BDuplicate & Fraud SweepTransactional · 5 stations

Scan

45 q

Score duplicate risk

1 live

Auto-block

42 q

Analyst review

8 q

Release or reject

8 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared scan

    -107m

    Invoice Capture Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  2. Holding at score duplicate risk

    -54m

    Invoice Capture Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Auto-block

run by Invoice Capture Agent · AI GBS layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Handed to the AI GBS depot

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 1h 47m against a commitment of 1h 26m · 124% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 22 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 21m · 22 people or records downstream of this decision