LensReading which lens this session carries.
PR6B-1032Evidence postedmedium materiality

Supplier record at fraud check

Grace Marchetti

Procurement & Source-to-Pay · Supplier Onboarding · PR6B Supplier Data Change

$75k

value

68%

confidence

29

people affected

4h 3m

age

6h 3m

sla

50%

progress

Currently held by

S2P spine

Running in the shared AI GBS spine

Raised by

Callum Haddad

Requester of record

At station

Fraud check

AI GBS layer · station 3 of 6

Where this train is on the line

PR6BSupplier Data ChangeTransactional · 6 stations

Request

34 q

Verify change

7 q

Fraud check

1 live

Approve

6 q

Apply

1 q

Notify

29 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared request

    -243m

    Registration Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared verify change

    -162m

    Director, Supplier Management

    Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited

  3. Holding at fraud check

    -81m

    Registration Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Approve

run by Director, Supplier Management · Policy layer

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the supplier record decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

approver Director, Supplier Management

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 4h 3m against a commitment of 6h 3m · 67% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 29 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading