LensReading which lens this session carries.
PR6B-1003Evidence postedmedium materiality

Supplier record at verify change

Bruno Ito

Procurement & Source-to-Pay · Supplier Onboarding · PR6B Supplier Data Change

$80k

value

68%

confidence

13

people affected

3h 25m

age

2h 43m

sla

33%

progress

Currently held by

Bank Detail Verification Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Rosa Novak

Requester of record

At station

Verify change

Policy layer · station 2 of 6

Where this train is on the line

PR6BSupplier Data ChangeTransactional · 6 stations

Request

34 q

Verify change

1 live

Fraud check

35 q

Approve

6 q

Apply

1 q

Notify

29 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared request

    -205m

    Registration Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Holding at verify change

    -103m

    Director, Supplier Management

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Fraud check

run by Registration Agent · AI GBS layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Handed to the AI GBS depot

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 3h 25m against a commitment of 2h 43m · 126% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 13 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 42m · 13 people or records downstream of this decision