LensReading which lens this session carries.
PR4B-1024Auto-clearedmedium materiality

Negotiation at record

Yuki Sandoval

Procurement & Source-to-Pay · Negotiation & Award · PR4B Concession Approval

$60k

value

94%

confidence

18

people affected

2h 22m

age

1h 46m

sla

100%

progress

Currently held by

GBS spine

Running in the shared AI GBS spine

Raised by

Daniel Brennan

Requester of record

At station

Record

AI GBS layer · station 5 of 5

Where this train is on the line

PR4BConcession ApprovalTransactional · 5 stations

Request

33 q

Model impact

1 q

Policy screen

23 q

Approve

4 q

Record

1 live

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared request

    -142m

    Negotiation Prep Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared model impact

    -114m

    Concession Modeling Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  3. Cleared policy screen

    -85m

    Concession Modeling Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  4. Cleared approve

    -57m

    VP Sourcing

    Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited

  5. Holding at record

    -28m

    Term Comparison Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

What happens next

The next station and its rule

This is the last station.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 2h 22m against a commitment of 1h 46m · 134% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 18 records or people downstream
state auto-cleared — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 36m · 18 people or records downstream of this decision