LensReading which lens this session carries.
PR3B-1033Auto-clearedmedium materiality

Sourcing event at order

Talia Costa

Procurement & Source-to-Pay · Sourcing & RFx · PR3B Rapid Sourcing

$47k

value

97%

confidence

36

people affected

1h 25m

age

1h 14m

sla

100%

progress

Currently held by

S2P spine

Running in the shared AI GBS spine

Raised by

Idris Duarte

Requester of record

At station

Order

AI GBS layer · station 6 of 6

Where this train is on the line

PR3BRapid SourcingTransactional · 6 stations

Capture

27 q

Match framework

22 q

Compare

19 q

Auto-award in-policy

31 q

Escalate

7 q

Order

1 live

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared match framework

    -85m

    Requirement Capture Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  2. Cleared compare

    -68m

    Requirement Capture Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  3. Cleared auto-award in-policy

    -51m

    Requirement Capture Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  4. Cleared escalate

    -34m

    Director, Strategic Sourcing

    Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited

  5. Holding at order

    -17m

    Requirement Capture Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

What happens next

The next station and its rule

This is the last station.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 1h 25m against a commitment of 1h 14m · 115% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 36 records or people downstream
state auto-cleared — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 11m · 36 people or records downstream of this decision