Spend line at escalate repeat

Victor Mensah

Procurement & Source-to-Pay · Spend Analytics · PR2B Maverick Spend Sweep

$26k

value

81%

confidence

people affected

10h 1m

age

6h 22m

sla

100%

progress

Currently held by

Spend Classification Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Priya Sandoval

Requester of record

At station

Escalate repeat

Policy layer · station 4 of 4

Where this train is on the line

PR2BMaverick Spend SweepTransactional · 4 stations

Detect off-contract

20 q

Notify requester

24 q

Redirect to contract

1 q

Escalate repeat

1 live

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

Auditor pack

This is the readable trail. more

Cleared detect off-contract
-601m
Spend Classification Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Cleared notify requester
-451m
Spend Classification Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Cleared redirect to contract
-301m
Spend Classification Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Holding at escalate repeat
-150m
Director, Procurement Analytics
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

This is the last station. more

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 10h 1m against a commitment of 6h 22m · 157% of the time used

materiality low · blast radius 17 records or people downstream

state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 3h 39m · 17 people or records downstream of this decision