Campaign send at quality gate
Wren Sandoval
Marketing · Campaign Orchestration · MK5A Integrated Campaign Run
$18k
value
90%
confidence
8
people affected
2h 6m
age
1h 12m
sla
63%
progress
Currently held by
Campaign Quality Agent
An agent owns the next move
Raised by
Sanjay Whitfield
Requester of record
At station
Quality gate
Workflow layer · station 5 of 8
Where this train is on the line
Evidence trail
Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind
This is the readable trail. more
Cleared plan
-126mCalendar Coordination Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Cleared sequence channels
-101mCross-channel Sequencing Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Cleared suppression check
-76mCalendar Coordination Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Cleared consent check
-50mCalendar Coordination Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Holding at quality gate
-25mFrequency Cap Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
What happens next
The next station and its rule
Launch
run by Director, Campaign Operations · Policy layer
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the campaign send decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
approver Director, Campaign Operations
Why the signal is what it is
Derived from time against commitment, not from the state
Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.
Past SLA by 54m · 8 people or records downstream of this decision