LensReading which lens this session carries.
IT5A-1025In flightmedium materiality

Network change at auto-remediate known

Idris Voss

Information Technology · Network · IT5A Network Incident

$81k

value

90%

confidence

8

people affected

1h 56m

age

1h 13m

sla

50%

progress

Currently held by

GBS spine

Running in the shared AI GBS spine

Raised by

Daniel Sorensen

Requester of record

At station

Auto-remediate known

AI GBS layer · station 3 of 6

Where this train is on the line

IT5ANetwork IncidentTransactional · 6 stations

Detect

7 q

Correlate

3 q

Auto-remediate known

1 live

Escalate

0 q

Restore

13 q

Post-mortem

25 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared detect

    -116m

    Network Orchestrator

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  2. Cleared correlate

    -77m

    Topology Monitoring Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  3. Holding at auto-remediate known

    -39m

    Performance Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Escalate

run by Director, Network Services · Policy layer

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the network change decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

approver Director, Network Services

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 1h 56m against a commitment of 1h 13m · 159% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 8 records or people downstream
state in-flight — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 43m · 8 people or records downstream of this decision