LensReading which lens this session carries.
IT3C-1009Human holdmedium materiality

Device at budget check

Kofi Mensah

Information Technology · End-User Compute · IT3C Device Refresh

$57k

value

41%

confidence

312

people affected

6h 24m

age

6h 3m

sla

43%

progress

Currently held by

Director, Workplace Technology

A person owns the next move

Raised by

Nadia Ito

Requester of record

At station

Budget check

Workflow layer · station 3 of 7

Where this train is on the line

IT3CDevice RefreshTransactional · 7 stations

Detect age

27 q

Model cost

5 q

Budget check

1 live

Approve

6 q

Order

15 q

Swap

35 q

Retire

24 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared detect age

    -384m

    Device Provisioning Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  2. Cleared model cost

    -256m

    Patch Compliance Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  3. Holding at budget check

    -128m

    Software Deployment Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Approve

run by Director, Workplace Technology · Policy layer

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the device decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

approver Director, Workplace Technology

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Red. This item is past the time it was committed to and it is either high or critical materiality or wide enough downstream to matter. Red says nothing about who holds it: an item can be red and still be moving through an agent that has not stopped.

clock 6h 24m against a commitment of 6h 3m · 106% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 312 records or people downstream
state human-hold — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 21m · 312 people or records downstream of this decision

Open the escalation lane