LensReading which lens this session carries.
HR2C-1020Evidence postedlow materiality

Requisition at score

Priya Mensah

Human Resources · Talent Acquisition · HR2C Agency & Vendor Management

$2k

value

81%

confidence

39

people affected

5h 11m

age

5h 41m

sla

100%

progress

Currently held by

Talent Acquisition Orchestrator

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Kofi Sorensen

Requester of record

At station

Score

Workflow layer · station 5 of 5

Where this train is on the line

HR2CAgency & Vendor ManagementTransactional · 5 stations

Brief

7 q

Route

3 q

Track

2 q

Invoice

10 q

Score

1 live

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared brief

    -311m

    Intake & Req Definition Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared route

    -249m

    Sourcing Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  3. Cleared track

    -187m

    Screening Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  4. Cleared invoice

    -124m

    Intake & Req Definition Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  5. Holding at score

    -62m

    Assessment Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

This is the last station.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 5h 11m against a commitment of 5h 41m · 91% of the time used
materiality low · blast radius 39 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading