LensReading which lens this session carries.
HR2A-1041In flightlow materiality

Requisition at intake

Daniel Bianchi

Human Resources · Talent Acquisition · HR2A Req-to-Offer

$22k

value

92%

confidence

34

people affected

1h 2m

age

4h 9m

sla

9%

progress

Currently held by

Assessment Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Nadia Mensah

Requester of record

At station

Intake

Workflow layer · station 1 of 11

Where this train is on the line

HR2AReq-to-OfferTransactional · 11 stations

Intake

1 live

Approve req

1 q

Post

23 q

Source

40 q

Screen

37 q

Interview loop

38 q

Assess

33 q

Offer model

19 q

Offer approve

4 q

Accept

15 q

Handoff

31 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Holding at intake

    -62m

    Intake & Req Definition Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Approve req

run by VP Talent Acquisition · Policy layer

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the requisition decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

approver VP Talent Acquisition

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 1h 2m against a commitment of 4h 9m · 25% of the time used
materiality low · blast radius 34 records or people downstream
state in-flight — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading