LensReading which lens this session carries.
HR2A-1029In flightmedium materiality

Requisition at intake

Rosa Costa

Human Resources · Talent Acquisition · HR2A Req-to-Offer

$77k

value

85%

confidence

37

people affected

4h 45m

age

4h 9m

sla

9%

progress

Currently held by

Assessment Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Pierre Whitfield

Requester of record

At station

Intake

Workflow layer · station 1 of 11

Where this train is on the line

HR2AReq-to-OfferTransactional · 11 stations

Intake

1 live

Approve req

1 q

Post

23 q

Source

40 q

Screen

37 q

Interview loop

38 q

Assess

33 q

Offer model

19 q

Offer approve

4 q

Accept

15 q

Handoff

31 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Holding at intake

    -285m

    Intake & Req Definition Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Approve req

run by VP Talent Acquisition · Policy layer

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the requisition decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

approver VP Talent Acquisition

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 4h 45m against a commitment of 4h 9m · 114% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 37 records or people downstream
state in-flight — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 36m · 37 people or records downstream of this decision