Listening cycle at re-identification check
Pierre Sandoval
Human Resources · Culture & Engagement · HR10A Engagement Survey Cycle
$44k
value
73%
confidence
5
people affected
5h 35m
age
5h 3m
sla
63%
progress
Currently held by
Sentiment Sensing Agent
An agent owns the next move
Raised by
Farrah Lindqvist
Requester of record
At station
Re-identification check
Workflow layer · station 5 of 8
Where this train is on the line
Evidence trail
Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind
This is the readable trail. more
Cleared design
-335mSentiment Sensing Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Cleared works council clear
-268mDirector, Culture & Engagement
Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited
Cleared field
-201mAction Plan Tracker
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Cleared synthesize themes
-134mAction Plan Tracker
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Holding at re-identification check
-67mRecognition Program Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
What happens next
The next station and its rule
Leader readout
run by Director, Culture & Engagement · Policy layer
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the listening cycle decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
approver Director, Culture & Engagement
Why the signal is what it is
Derived from time against commitment, not from the state
Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.
Past SLA by 32m · 5 people or records downstream of this decision