Automation at deploy
Maeve Lindqvist
AI GBS & Global Business Services · Automation Factory · GB7A Idea to Production
$90k
value
94%
confidence
4
people affected
2h 21m
age
1h 27m
sla
89%
progress
Currently held by
AI-OPS spine
Running in the shared AI GBS spine
Raised by
Victor Brennan
Requester of record
At station
Deploy
AI GBS layer · station 8 of 9
Where this train is on the line
Evidence trail
Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind
This is the readable trail. more
Cleared approve
-141mHead of Automation
Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited
Cleared build
-113mDeployment Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Cleared test
-85mRegression Monitor Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Cleared control review
-56mHead of Automation
Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited
Holding at deploy
-28mTest Harness Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
What happens next
The next station and its rule
Monitor
run by Build Policy Agent · Workflow layer
No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.
Why the signal is what it is
Derived from time against commitment, not from the state
Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.
Past SLA by 54m · 4 people or records downstream of this decision