LensReading which lens this session carries.
GB5C-1021Evidence postedmedium materiality

Service request at route or refuse

Idris Achebe

AI GBS & Global Business Services · Service Catalog & Intake · GB5C Off-catalog Demand

$66k

value

72%

confidence

30

people affected

3h 24m

age

6h 32m

sla

75%

progress

Currently held by

Intake Analytics Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Mei Haddad

Requester of record

At station

Route or refuse

Policy layer · station 3 of 4

Where this train is on the line

GB5COff-catalog DemandTransactional · 4 stations

Detect

25 q

Assess

21 q

Route or refuse

1 live

Feed catalog backlog

13 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared detect

    -204m

    Catalog Definition Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared assess

    -136m

    Demand Intake Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  3. Holding at route or refuse

    -68m

    Head of Service Catalog

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Feed catalog backlog

run by Routing Agent · Workflow layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 3h 24m against a commitment of 6h 32m · 52% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 30 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading