LensReading which lens this session carries.
GB5B-1026Evidence postedmedium materiality

Service request at impact assess

Pierre Marchetti

AI GBS & Global Business Services · Service Catalog & Intake · GB5B Catalog Item Change

$62k

value

79%

confidence

5

people affected

2h 56m

age

5h 16m

sla

40%

progress

Currently held by

Eligibility Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Sofia Whitfield

Requester of record

At station

Impact assess

Workflow layer · station 2 of 5

Where this train is on the line

GB5BCatalog Item ChangeTransactional · 5 stations

Propose

10 q

Impact assess

1 live

Approve

2 q

Publish

23 q

Communicate

4 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail. The same actions are held in the append-only evidence spine with their authority grant, version stamps and hash links; open the auditor pack to see them.

  1. Cleared propose

    -176m

    Catalog Definition Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Holding at impact assess

    -88m

    Demand Intake Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Approve

run by Head of Service Catalog · Policy layer

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the service request decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

approver Head of Service Catalog

Why the signal is what it is

Plain reading of the current state

Amber. The agent completed the work but the outcome fell into a sampling band, so it posted evidence for review rather than closing silently. Work carries on; a human confirms after the fact.