LensReading which lens this session carries.
GB5B-1001In flightmedium materiality

Service request at publish

Amara Mensah

AI GBS & Global Business Services · Service Catalog & Intake · GB5B Catalog Item Change

$74k

value

91%

confidence

11

people affected

2h 52m

age

2h 29m

sla

80%

progress

Currently held by

AI-OPS spine

Running in the shared AI GBS spine

Raised by

Sofia Raman

Requester of record

At station

Publish

AI GBS layer · station 4 of 5

Where this train is on the line

GB5BCatalog Item ChangeTransactional · 5 stations

Propose

10 q

Impact assess

17 q

Approve

2 q

Publish

1 live

Communicate

4 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared propose

    -172m

    Catalog Definition Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared impact assess

    -129m

    Demand Intake Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  3. Cleared approve

    -86m

    Head of Service Catalog

    Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited

  4. Holding at publish

    -43m

    Catalog Definition Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Communicate

run by Entitlement Agent · Workflow layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 2h 52m against a commitment of 2h 29m · 115% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 11 records or people downstream
state in-flight — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 23m · 11 people or records downstream of this decision