LensReading which lens this session carries.
GB11A-1004Evidence postedmedium materiality

Cost line at draft narrative

Pierre Ferreira

AI GBS & Global Business Services · Cost-to-Serve Management · GB11A Period Cost-to-Serve

$56k

value

77%

confidence

29

people affected

11h 29m

age

1d 0h

sla

71%

progress

Currently held by

Cost-to-Serve Orchestrator

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Hiro Whitfield

Requester of record

At station

Draft narrative

Workflow layer · station 5 of 7

Where this train is on the line

GB11APeriod Cost-to-ServeAnalytical · 7 stations

Collect volumes

2 q

Collect model spend

35 q

Compute unit cost

13 q

Compare baseline

29 q

Draft narrative

1 live

Review

9 q

Publish

27 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail. The same actions are held in the append-only evidence spine with their authority grant, version stamps and hash links; open the auditor pack to see them.

  1. Cleared collect volumes

    -689m

    Unit Cost Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  2. Cleared collect model spend

    -551m

    Unit Cost Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  3. Cleared compute unit cost

    -413m

    Volume Attribution Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  4. Cleared compare baseline

    -276m

    Chargeback Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  5. Holding at draft narrative

    -138m

    Benchmark Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Review

run by Head of Service Economics · Policy layer

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the cost line decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

approver Head of Service Economics

Why the signal is what it is

Plain reading of the current state

Amber. The agent completed the work but the outcome fell into a sampling band, so it posted evidence for review rather than closing silently. Work carries on; a human confirms after the fact.