Incident at mitigate
Jonas Muller
Engineering · Site Reliability · EN7A Incident Response
$36k
value
91%
confidence
7
people affected
4h 19m
age
4h 15m
sla
63%
progress
Currently held by
Incident Commander Agent
An agent owns the next move
Raised by
Owen Rhodes
Requester of record
At station
Mitigate
Workflow layer · station 5 of 8
Where this train is on the line
Evidence trail
Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind
This is the readable trail. more
Cleared detect
-259mAlert Correlation Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Cleared correlate alerts
-207mAlert Correlation Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Cleared execute runbook
-155mAlert Correlation Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Cleared escalate to human commander
-104mDirector, Site Reliability
Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited
Holding at mitigate
-52mError Budget Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
What happens next
The next station and its rule
Restore
run by Post-mortem Agent · Workflow layer
No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.
Why the signal is what it is
Derived from time against commitment, not from the state
Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.
Past SLA by 4m · 7 people or records downstream of this decision