Design decision at auto-file issue
Grace Novak
Engineering · Architecture & Design · EN2B Pattern Compliance Sweep
$6k
value
93%
confidence
14
people affected
3h 16m
age
2h 49m
sla
60%
progress
Currently held by
GBS spine
Running in the shared AI GBS spine
Raised by
Victor Ito
Requester of record
At station
Auto-file issue
AI GBS layer · station 3 of 5
Where this train is on the line
Evidence trail
Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind
This is the readable trail. more
Cleared scan repositories
-196mArchitecture Orchestrator
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Cleared flag deviation
-131mPattern Compliance Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Holding at auto-file issue
-65mPattern Compliance Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
What happens next
The next station and its rule
Owner review
run by Chief Architect · Policy layer
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the design decision decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
approver Chief Architect
Why the signal is what it is
Derived from time against commitment, not from the state
Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.
Past SLA by 27m · 14 people or records downstream of this decision