LensReading which lens this session carries.
AD6C-1025Human holdlow materiality

Record set at legal review

Clara Duarte

Administration · Records & Information Management · AD6C Subject Access Request

$10k

value

61%

confidence

190

people affected

5h 50m

age

4h 26m

sla

80%

progress

Currently held by

Chief Records Officer

A person owns the next move

Raised by

Victor Whitfield

Requester of record

At station

Legal review

Policy layer · station 4 of 5

Where this train is on the line

AD6CSubject Access RequestTransactional · 5 stations

Receive

28 q

Locate records

40 q

Redact

12 q

Legal review

1 live

Release

23 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared receive

    -350m

    Classification Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared locate records

    -263m

    Classification Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  3. Cleared redact

    -175m

    Classification Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  4. Holding at legal review

    -88m

    Chief Records Officer

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Release

run by Privacy Redaction Agent · Workflow layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Red. This item is past the time it was committed to and it is either high or critical materiality or wide enough downstream to matter. Red says nothing about who holds it: an item can be red and still be moving through an agent that has not stopped.

clock 5h 50m against a commitment of 4h 26m · 132% of the time used
materiality low · blast radius 190 records or people downstream
state human-hold — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 1h 24m · 190 people or records downstream of this decision

Open the escalation lane