LensReading which lens this session carries.
AD6C-1006Human holdmedium materiality

Record set at legal review

Daniel Achebe

Administration · Records & Information Management · AD6C Subject Access Request

$70k

value

41%

confidence

331

people affected

4h 39m

age

4h 26m

sla

80%

progress

Currently held by

Chief Records Officer

A person owns the next move

Raised by

Zara Rhodes

Requester of record

At station

Legal review

Policy layer · station 4 of 5

Where this train is on the line

AD6CSubject Access RequestTransactional · 5 stations

Receive

28 q

Locate records

40 q

Redact

12 q

Legal review

1 live

Release

23 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared receive

    -279m

    Classification Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared locate records

    -209m

    Classification Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  3. Cleared redact

    -140m

    Classification Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  4. Holding at legal review

    -70m

    Chief Records Officer

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Release

run by Privacy Redaction Agent · Workflow layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Red. This item is past the time it was committed to and it is either high or critical materiality or wide enough downstream to matter. Red says nothing about who holds it: an item can be red and still be moving through an agent that has not stopped.

clock 4h 39m against a commitment of 4h 26m · 105% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 331 records or people downstream
state human-hold — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 13m · 331 people or records downstream of this decision

Open the escalation lane