LensReading which lens this session carries.
AD6A-1018In flightmedium materiality

Record set at apply retention

Priya Delgado

Administration · Records & Information Management · AD6A Classify to Dispose

$47k

value

94%

confidence

36

people affected

1h 32m

age

56m

sla

43%

progress

Currently held by

R2R spine

Running in the shared AI GBS spine

Raised by

Clara Delgado

Requester of record

At station

Apply retention

AI GBS layer · station 3 of 7

Where this train is on the line

AD6AClassify to DisposeTransactional · 7 stations

Ingest

35 q

Classify

19 q

Apply retention

1 live

Hold check

6 q

Disposition approve

5 q

Execute

34 q

Certificate

35 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared ingest

    -92m

    Classification Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared classify

    -61m

    Classification Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  3. Holding at apply retention

    -31m

    Classification Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Hold check

run by Chief Records Officer · Policy layer

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the record set decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

approver Chief Records Officer

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 1h 32m against a commitment of 56m · 164% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 36 records or people downstream
state in-flight — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 36m · 36 people or records downstream of this decision