LensReading which lens this session carries.
AD10A-1012Evidence postedlow materiality

Service request at fulfill

Ethan Ito

Administration · Corporate Services · AD10A Service Request to Fulfillment

$32k

value

67%

confidence

31

people affected

1h 3m

age

52m

sla

67%

progress

Currently held by

Service Catalog Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Zara Petrov

Requester of record

At station

Fulfill

Workflow layer · station 4 of 6

Where this train is on the line

AD10AService Request to FulfillmentTransactional · 6 stations

Request

0 q

Triage

39 q

Route

2 q

Fulfill

1 live

Confirm

6 q

Close

41 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared request

    -63m

    Service Catalog Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared triage

    -47m

    Service Catalog Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  3. Cleared route

    -32m

    Supplier Performance Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  4. Holding at fulfill

    -16m

    Cost Allocation Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Confirm

run by Service Level Agent · Workflow layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 1h 3m against a commitment of 52m · 121% of the time used
materiality low · blast radius 31 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 11m · 31 people or records downstream of this decision