LensReading which lens this session carries.
The catalogueMarketingBrand & PositioningTransactional

Service MK1B

Brand Compliance Sweep

Runs transactional. Starts when a request lands in the queue. It runs 7,558 times a week across 5 stations. One of those stations stops for a person and 4 are done by an agent, 2 of them on the shared spine.

Runs a week

7,558

138 in flight right now.

Stations

5

1 person · 2 agent · 2 spine

Agent share of steps

80%

Autonomy on this service is set at 58% against a ceiling of 64%.

Decisions a person makes

1

Held by VP Brand.

Touchless

58%

Share of runs that complete without anybody opening them.

Timetable against actual

5.2h

Actual 5.7h, 0.5h over the timetable.

Operations

The lane diagram

Read it left to right.

Person1 station and 27% of the dwellAgent2 stations and 26% of the dwellShared spine2 stations and 47% of the dwell4 crossings between lanes
Human
decides
Agent
does the work
GBS
shared spine
System
attributed by rule
Customer Relationship Management
Customer Relationship Management
Customer Relationship Management
Customer Relationship Management
Marketing Automation
Click any station to see who does it, what it costs in time, the rule that gates it and the system attributed to it.

Operations

Every station in order

The same stations as a list, with the dwell the estate records against each one and the system a station of that shape would touch.

#StationLaneWhoLayerDwellTargetIn flightSystem
1

Scan assets

GBSBrand Orchestratorgbs1h 37m2h 54m19Customer Relationship Management
2

Flag drift

AgentBrand Consistency Monitorworkflow1h 2m1h 25m45Customer Relationship Management
3

Auto-correct

GBSBrand Consistency Monitorgbs57m1h 15m33Customer Relationship Management
4

Owner review

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the brand asset decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

HumanVP Brandpolicy1h 31m3h 33m4Customer Relationship Management
5

Close

AgentBrand Health Agentworkflow24m30m37Marketing Automation

Operations

Run it

Change the volume, move the autonomy line, release a gate, and watch what happens to the hours in each lane and to the time it takes one run to get through.

Move something
Demand100%
7,558 a week is what the estate records.
Decisions handed to agents0 of 0
This service has at most one gate, so there is nothing to hand over without removing the last human decision.
People on the gates328 people
Each one is assumed to have 2,100 productive minutes a week, which is 35 hours.
Agent speed100%
100% is the dwell the estate records today.
Person time a week
11,463h
7,558 items at 91 minutes of decision each.
Agent time a week
30,232h
240 minutes an item, which does not compete for a person.
Gate load
100%
Inside capacity, with 17h of headroom.
Stations without a person
80%
1 gate left on 5 stations.
Where an item spends its time
27% waiting on a person
73% in the agent lane
An item now takes 331 minutes of worked time end to end against 331 in the recorded estate, a change of +0%. This is worked time, not calendar time: nothing here models a queue or a weekend.
What this model is, on Brand Compliance Sweep

The simulation is arithmetic on the estate, not a queueing model.

How it runs

Run it again, going wrong

The same unit and the same stations, broken the way the estate already records breaking.

5 stations, walked twice

Once clean, once with the categories the estate counts

This is the same unit on the same stations, breaking.

No break below was chosen.

One play head, two tracks, the same scale. The clean run stops when it runs out of stations; the other one keeps going.

As written

5 stations, nothing waiting, nothing sent back

0 min of 5.5 hrs

now Scan assets · Brand Orchestrator · 1.6 hrs

As the ledger has it

the same stations, plus 4 categories the estate already counts

0 min of 17 hrs

now Scan assets · Brand Orchestrator · 1.6 hrs

personagentshared spinework the break addsnobody working it

What breaks, and where it is counted

No break below was chosen.

What the two runs say together

4 counted categories land on this procedure.

What this run cannot claim

These breaks are shown together on one unit so the shape of a bad day fits on one screen.

The separation register records a duty conflict against a sub-function and a named post, not against one procedure.

Two clocks run. Worked time is the sum of the time the work is actually being done …

Live observability

Systems this service would touch

Attributed by rule from the function's system list.

2 systems attributed

0 of 2 returning records

Customer Relationship Management

Salesforce Sales Cloud · crm · bidirectional · critical

modeled

4 of 5 stations attributed here · would write back

Marketing Automation

Marketo Engage · marketing · bidirectional · medium

modeled

1 of 5 stations attributed here · would write back

System attribution is a rule, not a reading.

Who runs it

Orchestration and accountability

Orchestrated by
Brand Orchestrator
That orchestrator’s remit
Owns brand asset work end to end inside Marketing. Runs 3 lines across 17 stations, drains the repeatable share into no shared tower, and holds 3 human gates.
Accountable person
VP Brand
Sub-function
Brand & Positioning
Shared spine tower
Not on the shared spine
Hand-over points
None — this service stays inside its function

Other services in this sub-function

2 alongside this one

What this page is and is not

This is a catalogue of the modeled estate.