LensReading which lens this session carries.
The catalogueHuman ResourcesLearning & DevelopmentTransactional

Service HR6C

Content Build

Runs transactional. Starts when a threshold is crossed. It runs 5,480 times a week across 5 stations. 2 of those stations stop for a person and 3 are done by an agent, none of them on the shared spine.

Runs a week

5,480

110 in flight right now.

Stations

5

2 person · 3 agent · 0 spine

Agent share of steps

60%

Autonomy on this service is set at 73% against a ceiling of 82%.

Decisions a person makes

2

Held by Director, Learning & Capability.

Touchless

81%

Share of runs that complete without anybody opening them.

Timetable against actual

8.4h

Actual 9.3h, 0.9h over the timetable.

Operations

The lane diagram

Read it left to right.

Person2 stations and 57% of the dwellAgent3 stations and 43% of the dwellShared spine0 stations and 0% of the dwell3 crossings between lanes
Human
decides
Agent
does the work
GBS
shared spine
System
attributed by rule
Core HR and Payroll
Recruiting and Applicant Tracking
Core HR and Payroll
Workforce Management
Core HR and Payroll
Click any station to see who does it, what it costs in time, the rule that gates it and the system attributed to it.

Operations

Every station in order

The same stations as a list, with the dwell the estate records against each one and the system a station of that shape would touch.

#StationLaneWhoLayerDwellTargetIn flightSystem
1

Brief

AgentSkills Gap Agentworkflow1h 58m2h 17m45Core HR and Payroll
2

Draft content

AgentCurriculum Curation Agentworkflow3h 5m4h 30m18Recruiting and Applicant Tracking
3

SME review

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the learning path decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

HumanDirector, Learning & Capabilitypolicy1h 58m4h 17m0Core HR and Payroll
4

Brand check

AgentContent Generation Agentworkflow34m44m45Workforce Management
5

Publish

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the learning path decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

HumanDirector, Learning & Capabilitypolicy5h 35m12h 37m2Core HR and Payroll

Operations

Run it

Change the volume, move the autonomy line, release a gate, and watch what happens to the hours in each lane and to the time it takes one run to get through.

Move something
Demand100%
5,480 a week is what the estate records.
Decisions handed to agents0 of 2
Cheapest decision first. The last gate never moves: something on this service always ends with a person.
People on the gates1183 people
Each one is assumed to have 2,100 productive minutes a week, which is 35 hours.
Agent speed100%
100% is the dwell the estate records today.
Person time a week
41,374h
5,480 items at 453 minutes of decision each.
Agent time a week
30,779.3h
337 minutes an item, which does not compete for a person.
Gate load
100%
Inside capacity, with 31h of headroom.
Stations without a person
60%
2 gates left on 5 stations.
Where an item spends its time
57% waiting on a person
43% in the agent lane
An item now takes 790 minutes of worked time end to end against 790 in the recorded estate, a change of +0%. This is worked time, not calendar time: nothing here models a queue or a weekend.
What this model is, on Content Build

The simulation is arithmetic on the estate, not a queueing model.

How it runs

Run it again, going wrong

The same unit and the same stations, broken the way the estate already records breaking.

5 stations, walked twice

Once clean, once with the categories the estate counts

This is the same unit on the same stations, breaking.

No break below was chosen.

One play head, two tracks, the same scale. The clean run stops when it runs out of stations; the other one keeps going.

As written

5 stations, nothing waiting, nothing sent back

0 min of 13 hrs

now Brief · Skills Gap Agent · 2.0 hrs

As the ledger has it

the same stations, plus 4 categories the estate already counts

0 min of 32 hrs

now Brief · Skills Gap Agent · 2.0 hrs

personagentshared spinework the break addsnobody working it

What breaks, and where it is counted

No break below was chosen.

What the two runs say together

4 counted categories land on this procedure.

What this run cannot claim

These breaks are shown together on one unit so the shape of a bad day fits on one screen.

Two clocks run. Worked time is the sum of the time the work is actually being done …

Live observability

Systems this service would touch

Attributed by rule from the function's system list.

3 systems attributed

0 of 3 returning records

Core HR and Payroll

Workday HCM · hcm · bidirectional · critical

modeled

3 of 5 stations attributed here · would write back

Recruiting and Applicant Tracking

Greenhouse · hcm · inbound · medium

modeled

1 of 5 stations attributed here · read only

Workforce Management

NICE WFM · service · inbound · medium

modeled

1 of 5 stations attributed here · read only

System attribution is a rule, not a reading.

Who runs it

Orchestration and accountability

Orchestrated by
L&D Orchestrator
That orchestrator’s remit
Owns learning path work end to end inside Human Resources. Runs 4 lines across 23 stations, drains the repeatable share into the H2R tower, and holds 4 human gates.
Accountable person
Director, Learning & Capability
Sub-function
Learning & Development
Shared spine tower
Not on the shared spine
Hand-over points
None — this service stays inside its function

What this page is and is not

This is a catalogue of the modeled estate.