LensReading which lens this session carries.
The catalogueAI GBS & Global Business ServicesService Delivery ManagementAnalytical

Service GB9B

Monthly Service Review

Runs analytical. Starts when a leader asks the question. It runs 27 times a week across 5 stations. One of those stations stops for a person and 4 are done by an agent, 1 of them on the shared spine.

Runs a week

27

97 in flight right now.

Stations

5

1 person · 3 agent · 1 spine

Agent share of steps

80%

Autonomy on this service is set at 66% against a ceiling of 74%.

Decisions a person makes

1

Held by Head of Service Delivery.

Touchless

56%

Share of runs that complete without anybody opening them.

Timetable against actual

135.3h

Actual 149.5h, 14.2h over the timetable.

Operations

The lane diagram

Read it left to right.

Person1 station and 42% of the dwellAgent3 stations and 43% of the dwellShared spine1 station and 15% of the dwell3 crossings between lanes
Human
decides
Agent
does the work
GBS
shared spine
System
attributed by rule
Group ERP — Financials
Enterprise Data Warehouse
Group ERP — Financials
Group ERP — Financials
Core HR and Payroll
Click any station to see who does it, what it costs in time, the rule that gates it and the system attributed to it.

Operations

Every station in order

The same stations as a list, with the dwell the estate records against each one and the system a station of that shape would touch.

#StationLaneWhoLayerDwellTargetIn flightSystem
1

Assemble performance

GBSStakeholder Reporting Agentgbs7h 4m16h 16m2Group ERP — Financials
2

Explain variance

AgentCapacity Balancing Agentworkflow4h 20m5h 52m35Enterprise Data Warehouse
3

Draft pack

AgentEscalation Management Agentworkflow8h 21m13h 19m29Group ERP — Financials
4

Review

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the service review decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

HumanHead of Service Deliverypolicy20h 23m42h 16m9Group ERP — Financials
5

Present

AgentIncident Coordination Agentworkflow8h 14m9h 56m22Core HR and Payroll

Operations

Run it

Change the volume, move the autonomy line, release a gate, and watch what happens to the hours in each lane and to the time it takes one run to get through.

Move something
Demand100%
27 a week is what the estate records.
Decisions handed to agents0 of 0
This service has at most one gate, so there is nothing to hand over without removing the last human decision.
People on the gates16 people
Each one is assumed to have 2,100 productive minutes a week, which is 35 hours.
Agent speed100%
100% is the dwell the estate records today.
Person time a week
550.4h
27 items at 1,223 minutes of decision each.
Agent time a week
755.6h
1,679 minutes an item, which does not compete for a person.
Gate load
98%
Inside capacity, with 9.7h of headroom.
Stations without a person
80%
1 gate left on 5 stations.
Where an item spends its time
42% waiting on a person
58% in the agent lane
An item now takes 2,902 minutes of worked time end to end against 2,902 in the recorded estate, a change of +0%. This is worked time, not calendar time: nothing here models a queue or a weekend.
What this model is, on Monthly Service Review

The simulation is arithmetic on the estate, not a queueing model.

How it runs

Run it again, going wrong

The same unit and the same stations, broken the way the estate already records breaking.

5 stations, walked twice

Once clean, once with the categories the estate counts

This is the same unit on the same stations, breaking.

No break below was chosen.

One play head, two tracks, the same scale. The clean run stops when it runs out of stations; the other one keeps going.

As written

5 stations, nothing waiting, nothing sent back

0 min of 2.0 days

now Assemble performance · Stakeholder Reporting Agent · 7.1 hrs

As the ledger has it

the same stations, plus 5 categories the estate already counts

0 min of 3.3 days

now Assemble performance · Stakeholder Reporting Agent · 7.1 hrs

personagentshared spinework the break addsnobody working it

What breaks, and where it is counted

No break below was chosen.

What the two runs say together

5 counted categories land on this procedure.

What this run cannot claim

These breaks are shown together on one unit so the shape of a bad day fits on one screen.

The separation register records a duty conflict against a sub-function and a named post, not against one procedure.

Two clocks run. Worked time is the sum of the time the work is actually being done …

Live observability

Systems this service would touch

Attributed by rule from the function's system list.

3 systems attributed

0 of 3 returning records

Group ERP — Financials

SAP S/4HANA · ledger · bidirectional · critical

modeled

3 of 5 stations attributed here · would write back

Enterprise Data Warehouse

Snowflake · analytics · inbound · critical

modeled

1 of 5 stations attributed here · read only

Core HR and Payroll

Workday HCM · hcm · bidirectional · critical

modeled

1 of 5 stations attributed here · would write back

System attribution is a rule, not a reading.

Who runs it

Orchestration and accountability

Orchestrated by
Service Delivery Orchestrator
That orchestrator’s remit
Owns service review work end to end inside AI GBS & Global Business Services. Runs 4 lines across 22 stations, drains the repeatable share into the AI-OPS tower, and holds 4 human gates.
Accountable person
Head of Service Delivery
Sub-function
Service Delivery Management
Shared spine tower
ai-ops
Hand-over points
None — this service stays inside its function

What this page is and is not

This is a catalogue of the modeled estate.