LensReading which lens this session carries.
The catalogueFinanceCost & ProfitabilityJudgment

Service FI10C

Cost Structure Position

Runs judgment. Starts when a leadership team frames the question. It runs 5 times a week across 5 stations. One of those stations stops for a person and 4 are done by an agent, none of them on the shared spine.

Runs a week

5

89 in flight right now.

Stations

5

1 person · 4 agent · 0 spine

Agent share of steps

80%

Autonomy on this service is set at 55% against a ceiling of 84%.

Decisions a person makes

1

Held by Director, Profitability Analytics.

Touchless

40%

Share of runs that complete without anybody opening them.

Timetable against actual

699.6h

Actual 607.5h, 92.1h under the timetable.

Operations

The lane diagram

Read it left to right.

Person1 station and 41% of the dwellAgent4 stations and 59% of the dwellShared spine0 stations and 0% of the dwell1 crossing between lanes
Human
decides
Agent
does the work
GBS
shared spine
System
attributed by rule
Enterprise Data Warehouse
Enterprise Data Warehouse
Enterprise Data Warehouse
Enterprise Data Warehouse
Group ERP — Financials
Click any station to see who does it, what it costs in time, the rule that gates it and the system attributed to it.

Operations

Every station in order

The same stations as a list, with the dwell the estate records against each one and the system a station of that shape would touch.

#StationLaneWhoLayerDwellTargetIn flightSystem
1

Frame

AgentCost Allocation Agentstrategy33h 53m68h 51m36Enterprise Data Warehouse
2

Model options

AgentProduct Margin Agentstrategy31h 43m42h 13m28Enterprise Data Warehouse
3

Draft position

AgentCustomer Profitability Agentstrategy31h 21m52h 18m21Enterprise Data Warehouse
4

Challenge

AgentCost-to-Serve Agentstrategy23h 34m52h 22m1Enterprise Data Warehouse
5

CFO ratify

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the analysis decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

HumanDirector, Profitability Analyticspolicy83h 8m167h 50m3Group ERP — Financials

Operations

Run it

Change the volume, move the autonomy line, release a gate, and watch what happens to the hours in each lane and to the time it takes one run to get through.

Move something
Demand100%
5 a week is what the estate records.
Decisions handed to agents0 of 0
This service has at most one gate, so there is nothing to hand over without removing the last human decision.
People on the gates12 people
Each one is assumed to have 2,100 productive minutes a week, which is 35 hours.
Agent speed100%
100% is the dwell the estate records today.
Person time a week
415.7h
5 items at 4,988 minutes of decision each.
Agent time a week
602.6h
7,231 minutes an item, which does not compete for a person.
Gate load
99%
Inside capacity, with 4.3h of headroom.
Stations without a person
80%
1 gate left on 5 stations.
Where an item spends its time
41% waiting on a person
59% in the agent lane
An item now takes 12,219 minutes of worked time end to end against 12,219 in the recorded estate, a change of +0%. This is worked time, not calendar time: nothing here models a queue or a weekend.
What this model is, on Cost Structure Position

The simulation is arithmetic on the estate, not a queueing model.

How it runs

Run it again, going wrong

The same unit and the same stations, broken the way the estate already records breaking.

5 stations, walked twice

Once clean, once with the categories the estate counts

This is the same unit on the same stations, breaking.

No break below was chosen.

One play head, two tracks, the same scale. The clean run stops when it runs out of stations; the other one keeps going.

As written

5 stations, nothing waiting, nothing sent back

0 min of 8.5 days

now Frame · Cost Allocation Agent · 34 hrs

As the ledger has it

the same stations, plus 2 categories the estate already counts

0 min of 8.6 days

now Frame · Cost Allocation Agent · 34 hrs

personagentshared spinework the break addsnobody working it

What breaks, and where it is counted

No break below was chosen.

What the two runs say together

2 counted categories land on this procedure.

What this run cannot claim

These breaks are shown together on one unit so the shape of a bad day fits on one screen.

Two clocks run. Worked time is the sum of the time the work is actually being done …

Live observability

Systems this service would touch

Attributed by rule from the function's system list.

2 systems attributed

0 of 2 returning records

Enterprise Data Warehouse

Snowflake · analytics · inbound · critical

modeled

4 of 5 stations attributed here · read only

Group ERP — Financials

SAP S/4HANA · ledger · bidirectional · critical

modeled

1 of 5 stations attributed here · would write back

System attribution is a rule, not a reading.

Who runs it

Orchestration and accountability

Orchestrated by
Profitability Orchestrator
That orchestrator’s remit
Owns analysis work end to end inside Finance. Runs 3 lines across 16 stations, drains the repeatable share into the P2P tower, and holds 3 human gates.
Accountable person
Director, Profitability Analytics
Sub-function
Cost & Profitability
Shared spine tower
Not on the shared spine
Hand-over points
None — this service stays inside its function

Other services in this sub-function

2 alongside this one

What this page is and is not

This is a catalogue of the modeled estate.