LensReading which lens this session carries.
SC7B-1010Evidence postedmedium materiality

Declaration at specialist review

Maeve Farouk

Supply Chain · Trade & Customs · SC7B Classification Review

$45k

value

69%

confidence

18

people affected

2h 25m

age

1h 9m

sla

75%

progress

Currently held by

Restricted Party Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Aaron Adeyemi

Requester of record

At station

Specialist review

Policy layer · station 3 of 4

Where this train is on the line

SC7BClassification ReviewTransactional · 4 stations

Detect new item

12 q

Draft classification

2 q

Specialist review

1 live

Register

38 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared detect new item

    -145m

    Classification Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared draft classification

    -97m

    Duty Optimization Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  3. Holding at specialist review

    -48m

    Director, Global Trade

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Register

run by Classification Agent · AI GBS layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Handed to the AI GBS depot

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 2h 25m against a commitment of 1h 9m · 210% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 18 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 1h 16m · 18 people or records downstream of this decision