LensReading which lens this session carries.
SC5B-1005In flightlow materiality

Shipment at auto-dispute variance

Marcus Petrov

Supply Chain · Logistics & Transportation · SC5B Freight Invoice Audit

$28k

value

91%

confidence

8

people affected

1h 2m

age

54m

sla

60%

progress

Currently held by

M2D spine

Running in the shared AI GBS spine

Raised by

Hannah Ferreira

Requester of record

At station

Auto-dispute variance

AI GBS layer · station 3 of 5

Where this train is on the line

SC5BFreight Invoice AuditTransactional · 5 stations

Receive

35 q

Match to booking

2 q

Auto-dispute variance

1 live

Analyst review

1 q

Approve

23 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared receive

    -62m

    Carrier Selection Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  2. Cleared match to booking

    -41m

    Carrier Selection Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  3. Holding at auto-dispute variance

    -21m

    Carrier Selection Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Analyst review

run by Director, Logistics · Policy layer

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the shipment decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

approver Director, Logistics

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 1h 2m against a commitment of 54m · 115% of the time used
materiality low · blast radius 8 records or people downstream
state in-flight — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 8m · 8 people or records downstream of this decision