LensReading which lens this session carries.
SC2C-1044Evidence postedmedium materiality

Supply plan at model customer impact

Wren Bianchi

Supply Chain · Supply Planning · SC2C Allocation Decision

$43k

value

82%

confidence

23

people affected

1h 49m

age

2h 16m

sla

40%

progress

Currently held by

Constraint Detection Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Hannah Sorensen

Requester of record

At station

Model customer impact

Workflow layer · station 2 of 5

Where this train is on the line

SC2CAllocation DecisionTransactional · 5 stations

Detect scarcity

7 q

Model customer impact

1 live

Draft allocation

46 q

Leader decide

8 q

Communicate

23 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared detect scarcity

    -109m

    Capacity Balancing Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Holding at model customer impact

    -55m

    Constraint Detection Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Draft allocation

run by Material Requirements Agent · Workflow layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 1h 49m against a commitment of 2h 16m · 80% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 23 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading