LensReading which lens this session carries.
SC2B-1017Evidence postedlow materiality

Supply plan at escalate cost

Zara Duarte

Supply Chain · Supply Planning · SC2B Constraint Resolution

$7k

value

70%

confidence

12

people affected

2h 48m

age

7h 6m

sla

80%

progress

Currently held by

Allocation Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Wren Costa

Requester of record

At station

Escalate cost

Policy layer · station 4 of 5

Where this train is on the line

SC2BConstraint ResolutionTransactional · 5 stations

Detect shortage

25 q

Model options

40 q

Auto-expedite in-policy

24 q

Escalate cost

1 live

Execute

5 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared detect shortage

    -168m

    Capacity Balancing Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  2. Cleared model options

    -126m

    Constraint Detection Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  3. Cleared auto-expedite in-policy

    -84m

    Capacity Balancing Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  4. Holding at escalate cost

    -42m

    Director, Supply Planning

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Execute

run by Expedite Agent · Workflow layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 2h 48m against a commitment of 7h 6m · 39% of the time used
materiality low · blast radius 12 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading