LensReading which lens this session carries.
SC2B-1008Human holdmedium materiality

Supply plan at escalate cost

Sanjay Voss

Supply Chain · Supply Planning · SC2B Constraint Resolution

$62k

value

47%

confidence

158

people affected

43m

age

7h 6m

sla

80%

progress

Currently held by

Director, Supply Planning

A person owns the next move

Raised by

Amara Kaplan

Requester of record

At station

Escalate cost

Policy layer · station 4 of 5

Where this train is on the line

SC2BConstraint ResolutionTransactional · 5 stations

Detect shortage

25 q

Model options

40 q

Auto-expedite in-policy

24 q

Escalate cost

1 live

Execute

5 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared detect shortage

    -43m

    Capacity Balancing Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  2. Cleared model options

    -32m

    Constraint Detection Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  3. Cleared auto-expedite in-policy

    -22m

    Capacity Balancing Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  4. Holding at escalate cost

    -11m

    Director, Supply Planning

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Execute

run by Expedite Agent · Workflow layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 43m against a commitment of 7h 6m · 10% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 158 records or people downstream
state human-hold — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading